What’s that lovely chartreuse-coloured flower that is now blooming near the Oldman river and smells like honey? It’s Leafy Spurge – a nasty, invasive weed species.
James and I did our Poetry in the Park fourteener guided hike this morning in Alexander Wilderness Park (a beautiful nature reserve in Lethbridge, Alberta). There’s so much Leafy Spurge in that nature reserve (and Leafy Spurge does not belong there). Leafy Spurge is displacing many beautiful native flowering plants that should be protected in that park.
There’s still a lot of native beauty in Alexander Wilderness Park, in spite of all the Leafy Spurge. I have uploaded a few videos that I recorded when visiting Alexander Wilderness Park. In the videos, I showed some of the flowers that I was planning to guide others to see. I hope you’ll enjoy seeing them in my videos (though they’re better to see in person).
I was most delighted to see the Shining Penstemon in bloom on top of the coulees along the Lost Soul Ultra trail. There is a large patch of Shining Penstemon that grows right along the road into the park. It isn’t in bloom yet. I expect it will be later this week. It doesn’t last too long so it’s worth showing up often for the next while (so you don’t miss it).
If you do happen to miss the Shining Penstemon at Alexander Wilderness Park in Lethbridge, we will see it later on in Waterton while on one of our scheduled Poetry in the Park hikes there. Every single one of our hikes is worth showing up for. There are a lot of beautiful flowers blooming in the Lethbridge coulees right now. Why wait for Waterton’s Poetry in the Park free guided hikes?
Our next hike takes us just south of the Lethbridge Country Club on May 19, 2024. We will be meeting at a park in suburbia at 9 AM. This subdivision (Chinook Heights) is located near Scenic Drive, south. If you drive south on Scenic, from downtown, you will find it on the right hand side. There is only one park within Chinook Heights and it’s easy to find.
James and I will introduce a type of Fourteener (called Ballad Meter) to interested budding poets while we hike down to check out the budding flowers along the coulee trail which winds down to the Oldman River. We also expect to see a number of birds (as this is one of the best places in Lethbridge for bird-watching).
I have provided an example of a poem written in Ballad Meter below. I wrote this poem on May 14, 2024 after having watched a documentary about Leonardo Da Vinci. James and I will be discussing Leonardo Da Vinci and other Italian Renaissance artists on videos attached to my next blog post.
Observing Da Vinci
Observing Mona Lisa’s smile
is something we all do.
Most tend to linger for a while
so, likely you will, too.
I’ve lingered there, just wondering
what other people see.
The critics say this “perfect” thing
is all high art should be.
I like the painting but don’t see
it as the best I’ve seen.
And, for its time, it wouldn’t be
the best there’d ever been.
So why the rep? Do critics see
the artist, not the art?
Da Vinci’s “genius” meant that he
could pull the world apart
to understand, then engineer
a better world design.
But he fell short of this, I fear.
And yet, he did just fine.
He’s been renowned for centuries –
all humans know his name,
but is this man the whole world sees
observed by all the same?
I like his artwork – paintings and
his “engineering” plans
because he tried to understand
the world amongst its fans.
But is it genius just to see
the world with hopes to learn?
A genius is, it seems to me,
a title one must earn
by not just seeing with some wit,
but doing something new.
His plans fell short and so he bit
off more than he could chew.
He hoped to fly, as most men do,
but was it worth the fuss?
High aims accomplished nothing new
since fallen Icarus.
If he had spent his time instead
just painting everyday,
would he be famed, amongst the dead,
a “genius” anyway?
Though mastering his art technique
did win him some acclaim,
his mastering of his mystique
without it built his fame.
Leonardo Da Vinci could’ve made a comfortable living making art exclusively. Would his art have more value if he’d churned out a huge number of pieces over his lifetime? No. Rarity and impermanence makes things more valuable. His Last Supper is likely more valuable because it has been disappearing over the centuries. The fact that his 24 foot tall horse sculpture was destroyed makes us value what little remains all the more.
Perhaps, even though Da Vinci realized that he was a skilled artist, he realized that there really were more important things for him and everyone else at the time to put one’s energy and time into than art. Perhaps the fact that he branched out into engineering makes us value him more – as not just an artist but a “genius”.
Leonardo Da Vinci had proved himself as an artist. Did this make us all take his other endeavors more seriously? Were his engineering plans really original? Ahead of their time? This is worth discussing further.